Interviewing
Can You Turn Down the AI Interview and Stay in the Running?
Declining an AI interview often leaves you in the running, but not automatically, and the honest move is rarely a flat refusal. A request for an alternative format, made before you decide anything, is a different act from declining outright, and costs nothing to try, particularly where a state statute already requires your consent. Where no alternative exists and the employer runs one path through the process, declining and withdrawing your application tend to be the same decision in practice, and knowing that going in is the point.
The takeThe vendor line treats consent as a formality nobody reads closely, and the case for refusing on principle rarely mentions that refusal usually ends the process outright. Both skip the part where the real options actually live. Between full consent and a flat no sits a request that goes to a person rather than a checkbox, and it is the option most advice never names, probably because it is less dramatic than either extreme.
Where Olive fits
Open a role and see what the work shows
If an employer ever sends an Olive assessment, it is not an interview: no camera exists in the product, declining screen capture is a supported outcome, and a person writes six findings in words about how you worked with an AI assistant, never a number and never anything about how much AI you used. You are granted the same report the employer gets, free.
Rank your shortlistWhat You're Actually Consenting To
The consent screen before an AI-scored interview asks permission for one thing: letting a model score your recorded answers alongside, or instead of, a person. HireVue's own published explainability statement says its AI relies only on what you say, using no video analysis and no other audio characteristics, so not your facial expressions, your background, or your tone of voice 1. What you are agreeing to may be narrower than the checkbox implies.
That is a vendor describing its own product, not an independent audit, and it covers that vendor's AI-scored interviews only. Other platforms configure their own consent flows and score differently, so treat any specific claim about what an AI evaluates as true of that platform until you have a reason to think otherwise, not as a rule about AI interviews in general. It is also a claim about the scoring model rather than about the recording: the video still exists and recruiters still watch it.
A different format complicates this further. Some vendors run a live, conversational AI interviewer rather than a recorded one-way round. micro1's candidate-facing guide describes a conversational interview with its AI recruiter covering open-ended technical questions, scenario questions about how you think and communicate, and a coding challenge, ending in a real-time result 8. That is one company's screening product rather than an industry norm, and what any given format evaluates is set by whichever vendor built it, so ask directly and get the answer in writing.
Where Consent Is a Legal Requirement, Not Just a Formality
In at least two states, that checkbox is statute, not company policy. Illinois' Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act, in force since 2020, requires an employer to notify you, explain what the AI evaluates, and get your consent before AI analysis of a video interview for an Illinois-based role 2. Maryland has separately required a signed waiver since October 1, 2020 before a facial recognition service creates a facial template during an applicant's interview 3.
Illinois also bars evaluating any applicant who has not consented 2. The Maryland rule is narrower than it sounds: it reaches facial templates, not video recording, not voice, and not AI scoring of what you say 3. Elsewhere the checkbox is a term of the application and carries no equivalent weight, so check the rule for the state the role sits in rather than the state you are sitting in.
Neither statute attaches a penalty to an employer that ignores it. The Illinois Act as compiled names no enforcement agency and no private right to sue under it 4, and the Maryland section prescribes no penalty and no express private right of action 3. Under those two Acts the practical protection is the ability to withhold consent, not recourse afterward. Other law may reach the same facts, which is a question for a lawyer in that state and not something either statute answers.
Ask for an Alternative Format Before You Decide to Decline
A request for an alternative format is a different act from an outright refusal, and it belongs before any decision to decline. Ask the recruiter directly, in writing, whether a live conversation, a written response, or a call with a person is available instead of the AI-scored round, and keep the message to the format and the scheduling.
On at least one major platform, declining AI scoring is already a named option: HireVue's published statement says a candidate who opts out completes the same assessment, with recruiters manually reviewing and rating the responses against the same rating scales, and that the consent statement must tell candidates opting out will not exclude them from the hiring process 5. That is one vendor's stated design, and the consent screen is configurable by the employer deploying it, so what you are actually shown may differ even there. Confirm by asking rather than assuming.
A short, specific message beats a general objection. Name the round, ask whether a live call or a written response is available in place of it, and say you are happy to proceed on whichever path the recruiter can offer. That gives the person reading it a clear, low-effort action to take instead of a position to respond to.
Know What Usually Happens If You Decline
Be plain with yourself about the cost before you send anything: declining an AI interview with no alternative on offer often ends the application, particularly at a smaller employer running one path through the process. In a 2025 preprint reporting a field experiment at one platform for one junior developer role, 24 percent of the 23,000 candidates invited to the AI interview completed it, and within that pipeline not completing meant not advancing 6.
That 24 percent blends genuine refusal with a dead link, a missed deadline, and a job found elsewhere, so it is not a measure of how many people object on principle, and one platform and one role is not the market. What it shows is that in that pipeline non-completion functioned as an exit, which is the shape to expect wherever an employer offers no separate path. At a small employer with no alternative process at all, declining and withdrawing are often functionally the same decision, see whether the async video round is even worth keeping when every answer is scripted for the version aimed at the employer weighing whether to keep running it that way.
Name the Accommodation You Need, Not Just a Refusal
If your reason for declining is a disability, an accommodation request rests on different legal ground than a general refusal. The ADA makes it discrimination to fail to make reasonable accommodations for the known limitations of an otherwise qualified individual with a disability who is an applicant, not only an employee, unless the employer shows undue hardship, and it reaches employers with 15 or more employees 7.
Name the accommodation, whether a different format, more time, or a human reviewer. Say that you need it because of a disability or a medical condition, and route it through the accommodations contact rather than the general recruiter inbox if one is listed. You never have to name a diagnosis, though an employer can ask for documentation where the need is not obvious.
Employers are told the same rule reaches an AI-based assessment like any other test: whether ADA accommodations apply to an AI-based assessment, and what to offer names the same standard, changing the format rather than the skill being measured, from the side that has to answer the request. Reading it tells you what a reasonable answer is supposed to look like before you send yours.
Common questions
Can an employer reject me just for declining an AI interview?
Yes, in most of the US, because no general legal rule requires an employer to offer an alternative. Illinois requires your consent before AI analyzes a video interview for a role based there, meaning the AI cannot evaluate you without it 2, but the Act does not require the employer to keep considering you if you decline.
Is there a difference between declining and asking for an alternative format?
Yes, and it matters. A request for an alternative format goes to a person as a question about scheduling and format; a flat decline with no request attached usually just ends the process. Ask before you refuse, not instead of asking.
Does the AI in a video interview actually watch my face?
On at least one major platform, no: HireVue's own published statement says its AI relies only on what you say, not your expression, background, or tone of voice 1. That is a vendor describing its own product rather than an independent audit, it should not be assumed of every platform, and it is a claim about the scoring model, not the recording. The video still exists and recruiters still watch it.
What if I have a disability and the AI-scored format itself is the problem?
Ask for an accommodation specifically, rather than a general alternative, and say the format is a barrier because of a disability or a medical condition rather than leaving the reason out. The ADA makes it discrimination to fail to make reasonable accommodations for the known limitations of an otherwise qualified individual with a disability who is an applicant, not only an employee, unless the employer shows undue hardship, and it reaches employers with 15 or more employees 7. That is a stronger and more specific ask than a general refusal.
Do consent laws like Illinois's actually get enforced?
The Illinois Act itself creates no penalty, no state agency to enforce it, and no private right to sue under it 4, so the protection it gives is the ability to withhold consent rather than recourse afterward. Other Illinois law may reach the same facts, which is a question for a lawyer in that state.
References
- 1. 2025 Explainability Statement hirevue.com The vendor's own statement that its AI relies only on what is said, with no video analysis and no other audio characteristics, so not face, background, or tone of voice.
- 2. Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act, 820 ILCS 42 ilga.gov Illinois requires notice, an explanation of what the AI evaluates, and consent before AI analysis of a video interview, and bars evaluating an applicant who has not consented.
- 3. Chapter 446 (House Bill 1202), Labor and Employment - Use of Facial Recognition Services - Prohibition, Md. Code Lab. & Empl. section 3-717 mgaleg.maryland.gov Maryland requires a signed waiver before facial recognition creates a facial template during an applicant's interview; the section is limited to facial templates and prescribes no penalty.
- 4. 820 ILCS 42, Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act, Sec. 5 (Disclosure of the use of artificial intelligence analysis) ilga.gov The Act as compiled names no penalty, no enforcement agency and no private right of action for a violation.
- 5. 2025 Explainability Statement hirevue.com Opting out of AI scoring routes a candidate's response to manual recruiter review against the same rating scales, and the consent statement must say opting out will not exclude the candidate.
- 6. Better Together: Quantifying the Benefits of AI-Assisted Recruitment arxiv.org Of the 23,000 candidates invited to the AI interview in this field experiment, 24% completed it; within the pipeline, not completing meant not advancing.
- 7. 42 U.S.C. 12112 - Discrimination (Americans with Disabilities Act) uscode.house.gov The ADA's duty to make reasonable accommodations for an otherwise qualified individual with a known disability reaches applicants, not only employees, and is bounded by undue hardship.
- 8. Your complete micro1 AI interview guide micro1.ai A vendor's own description of a live conversational AI interview: open-ended technical questions, scenario questions on how the candidate thinks and communicates, a coding challenge, and a real-time result.
8 sources, numbered by first appearance. How Olive sources claims
General guidance for hiring teams. What works at one company and one volume may not transfer to yours.
Olive assesses how a person works with AI. It does not detect AI-written documents, and it never produces a score, a ranking, or a match percentage for a person. Candidates read the same report the employer reads.